Symbolism
Many moons ago, I had a few ancient and medieval art history classes, during one of which I had the great pleasure to witness the professor descend into a conniption about one contemporary piece (I can’t remember exactly what it was now) that was clearly trying to use symbolism to make its point, but turned out completely literal, and thus made us all a little dumber in the process. If I remember correctly, the discussion turned to popular culture, at which point we alternated lamenting the proliferation of predictable plot lines and defending the value of id-stimulating natural-disaster blockbusters. In other words, a typical college class.
I was reminded of that professor’s conniption the other night when we were catching up on the Colbert in our Hulu queue. I sat slack-jawed watching the clip of Hannity’s co-optation of a classic revolutionary symbol and the tortured over-explanation that followed. Symbolism is supposed to be meaningful shorthand for complex ideas, and not the other way around. It can get tricky at times, especially when you’re dealing with symbols used in a time or place foreign to you, which is exactly why teachers teach classes on, for example, early Christian and mythological imagery in ancient and medieval art and literature. But most of the time, you can and should simply count on your audience to use that wrinkled gooey mass between their ears and figure it out for themselves. If, however, you find that in order for your symbolic gesture to make the least bit of sense, you have to insert text labels on every constituent part and bend over backwards to show how they’re related, you might want to chuck it out and start over from scratch. Or stick with the original.