Happy Thanksgiving to all my loyal readers and listeners, please take a moment tomorrow to reflect on our Brave Men and Women serving in the US Military and the sacrifices that they make to keep us safe !

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) recently stated that the constitutional authority for Congress to require individuals to purchase health insurance is the same that allowed for Medicaid and Medicare, and for states to require driver's licenses. The last time I knew, Medicare and Medicaid were not mandatory, and for your information Senator Warner, although you do have to get a drivers license to drive in these 50 states, it is not mandatory that you obtain a drivers license if you don't wish to drive. No one is making you get one whether you want one or not and no one is fining you if you don't. What a ridiculous comparison! The Warner goes on to say that people without health care are currently going into hospitals and being treated and we are paying the bill and that is unfair. Huh? Isn't the Obama administration trying to tell us that there are 46 million people out there without health care who are at risk, now suddenly they can walk into a hospital and get it for free, it's just that we pay for it. Well, again, Senator Warner, if 46 million people without health care are actually able to still get free health care on our dime, then there are actually no persons in the country who cannot get health care as you Democrats keep saying there are. Furthermore, Senator Warner, wouldn't it be fair to say that if we are paying for those 46 million without health care that logic would dictate that we will be paying for 300 million people to get health care if the government run health care program passes in the Senate. That would mean that we would be paying for 254 million more than we are now. So tell me again why we would want ObamaCare. What a joke, and these people are running the country, scary.

Please watch this latest RNC ad on ObamaCare.

A recentRasmussen Poll indicates that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi remains the most well known and most disliked of Congressional leaders. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 58% of likely voters view Pelosi unfavorably, up just one point from September. That percentage has fallen in a range of 53% to 64% since Congress began its session in February. Thirty-four percent (34%) of voters give Pelosi a favorable review, showing no change from last month. That number includes just 11% who view her very favorably. Since February, the percentage of voters who rate Pelosi favorably has ranged from 30% to 36%. Pelosi's fellow Democrat, House Majority Leader Harry Reid, is viewed unfavorably by 45% of voters. Reid can expect to face a difficult re-election this year in Nevada, where recent Rasmussen polling shows him trailing two potential Republican challengers. Pelosi, AKA Nancy Pelocchio,AKA The Wicked Witch of the West on my show folks, has a favorable poll rating that rivals former President Bush's ratings. Where is the Main Stream News Media, why aren't they plastering Pelosi's poll numbers all over the TV and Newspapers like they did Bush. Okay, don't answer that because we all know why. These numbers speak for themselves folks, people are fed up, they have had it with the Congressional Democrats and their ram it through at all cost attitudes toward Health Care Reform, The Cap and Trade Bill, Amnesty for Illegals and their arrogance toward our military and intelligence agencies who protect our country. People are disgusted with a Congress (Controlled by Democrats since 2006) that is not listening to the American People. People are tired of being labeled "unamerican", "political terrorists", etc.. Remember the screed of Hillary Clinton during the Bush years when she said: "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we A

Liberty's March Has A New Generation Of Patriots http://www.teapartymovie.com/

Documentary film director Michael Moore, who has become a millionaire thanks to the profits from his movies, told CNSNews.com that "capitalism did nothing" for him. CNSNews caught up with Moore in Washington,D.C. outside the Uptown Theatre just before the premier of his new film which criticizes capitalism, "Capitalism: A Love Story." CNSNews.com asked: "Critics may say, when they see this movie, Michael Moore has amassed a fortune of over $50 million, some have said and -" Moore said: "Really? Are you kidding me? Seriously? Wow. Where did it go?" CNSNews.com then asked Moore: "Critics would say he's [Moore] been very successful under a capitalist system. How would you justify making a movie where you paint capitalism as evil?" Moore said: "Well, capitalism did nothing for me, starting with my first film." Really, Michael. Well according to Fortune Magazine, Mooreons films have grossed over $300 million worldwide. Further Moore (sorry folks couldn't resist) he has reportedly was paid for directing,producing and creating "Fahrenheit 9/11" to the tune of $21 million by Disney It gets better folks, Mooreon also made 50% of the profits from his film "Sicko" in the amount of $25 million plus profits from the DVD sales according to Vanity Fair And, that's not all folks, the LA Times reported that Mooreon made over $17 million in profit from the sale of "Sicko" DVDs. So Moore criticizes capitalism, but apparently capitalism works for him though. Here's how I see it Mike, you made millions on your crockumentaries, so now you are well off, but hey, why should any other poor slob be able to do the same. Capitalism is now evil because I have millions, but I don't want anyone else to have millions so now I oppose it. Oh, and hey Mike, since you are a supporter of his "Oneness", how about applying one of his principles in Socialism, you know since you think Capitalism sucks. You know what I'm talking about Mikey, redistribute the wealth! ,

The Washington Post published a piece by Paul Kane entitled "Democrats Are Jarred by Drop In Fundraising". The article states that Democrats have seen a decline in fundraising linking it to complacency and a boycott by many of their business donors, who are basically boycotting the Democrats for their critical views of big business, and also the state of the economy. While the Republicans have received 1.7 million more in donations than the Democrats for the month of August, the Democrats have seen a 20 percent drop in their donations. Through August, the DSCC had raised just $27.5 million, a drop of more than 25 percent, or $9.2 million, from the same point two years ago. While donations from special interest political action committees have increased, individual donors are disappearing at a rate that has alarmed party leaders: The DSCC's contributions from individuals was $18.5 million through August, a drop of $12.6 million, or nearly 40 percent, from two years earlier, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission. A midyear analysis by the FEC showed that the DSCC declines at that stage had come entirely from individuals who gave $10,000 or more, a small slice of overall contributors but a group that traditionally provides about half the committee's fundraising total. Through June, those individual donors' contributions had declined by more than 50 percent from 2007. The committee is running 12 percent behind its 2005 pace among large donors. So according to WaPo the Democrats are losing about 25 percent of their donations from individual voters. Of course the Democrats will cite the weak economy as a factor and that may be partially true, but have they even considered that people are fed up with big government ramming bills down their throats whether they want it or not? What the Democrats fail to realize is that America is still a middle to right country, not all of their supporters are liberal, anti-business, government should take c

According to Ed Klein of Newsweek Ted Kennedy liked to hear about any new jokes about Chappaquidick: Newsweek's Ed Klein (told interviewer) Katty Kay about Kennedy's love of humor. How the late senator loved to hear and tell Chappaquiddick jokes, and was always eager to know if anyone had heard any new ones. Not that Kennedy lacked remorse, Klein quickly added, seeming to intuit that my jaw and perhaps those of other listeners had just hit the floorboards. I gather it was a self-deprecating maneuver on Kennedy's part, exercised with the famous Kennedy charm, though it sounds like one of those "I guess you had to have been there" things. Here is the transcript of the clip: Kay: Ed Klein, that's what I'm hearing today, that people are sad at his passing, and yet celebrating this huge life and its huge long list of accomplishments. Klein: I think he'd be the last person who would want us, those he's left behind, to, um, be, uh, morose and, and full of bathos. I think he, he -- Kay: He would come in with a big guffawing laugh and make us laugh too. Klein: He would, yes. You're so right, he would. And he'd probably have a joke to tell as well. Kay: At his own expense. Klein: Well y'know, he, I don't know if you know this or not but, one of his favorite topics of humor was indeed Chappaquiddick itself. And he would ask people, "have you heard any new jokes about Chappaquiddick?" I mean, that is just the most amazing thing. It's not that he didn't feel remorse about the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, but that he still always saw, um, the other side of everything and the ridiculous side of things, too. Kay: Ed Klein, former foreign editor of Newsweek, and author of a new book on Ted Kennedy. Read More Here "...he still always saw, um, the other side of everything and the ridiculous side of things, too...." Really, what other side, it's funny that someone died and you are responsible for it, it's funny that you refused to take responsibility for it, it's funny th

WorldNet Daily is reporting that the man who claimed to have a copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate and attempted to sell it on ebay and then disappeared, has reappeared with a video of the document he claims proves Obama's Kenyan birth. Lucas Smith, known by the eBay handle "colmado_noranja," claimed to have an authentic birth certificate from Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa proving that Obama was born there at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961. He has released a video of him showing the document, which includes a close-up shot of the document's raised seal and the alleged footprint of Barack Obama. ( See video below) "My name is Lucas Smith, an American," the video states. "This is the birth certificate of Barack Obama." "I do have a background. I've made mistakes in my life," Smith told WND in an email. "It took a guy like me to go and get tangible proof about Obama. I don't mind breaking a few laws or policies here and there. I don't mind paying the military in foreign countries to look the other way ... The military [in Africa] will grant you access to anything for just a few dollars. People are starving. So yes, it takes a guy like me to get things done once in a while." At this time folks, I publish this article and leave it up to you to form your own opinion. I do know that hospitals do produce their own birth certificates that have a footprint and a seal. I have my sons. But I'm not sure whether or not they did this in Mombasa or in 1961 or not. I also know that at least here in the United States, the hospital birth record is not "certification of birth", you still need to obtain an "official birth certificate" from city hall.

Even though Congress is not going to read the over 1,000 page health care bill, it is good to know that the conservative bloggers in this country are. Peter Fleckenstein, a blogger and former Marine from Phoenix,AZ,has been reading through the ObamaCare bill page by page and highlighting the provisions he finds and posting them on his blog,Common Sense from a Common Man. Here are the highlights of the contents of bill that should cause every American to give pause and question this bill: * Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure! * Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed! * Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process). * Page 42: The "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None. * Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services. * Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Healthcard. * Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer. * Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (read: SEIU, UAW and ACORN) * Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange. * Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participate in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans). * Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastructure for services; translation: illegal aliens. * Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan. * Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter. * Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixing. No "judicial review" is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, p

This is a Playboy Channel Original Video of water boarding being applied to a "Lab Rat" volunteer journalist. He experienced this interrogation technique and did a great job of explaining his reactions.

According to FactCheck.org the first 100 days of the Obama Presidency are full of spin. On The Economy: During a March 24th news conference President Obama responded to critics of his budget figures who said they were too rosy by saying: "Our assumptions are perfectly consistent with what Blue Chip forecasters out there are saying." That wasn't true. As a matter of fact, at the time, the Blue Chip forecast was far more pessimistic than Obama's budget projections. Which means that a weaker economic performance would produce even larger deficits than Obama's budget forecasts. On The Budget: At the same news conference he claimed "we are reducing nondefense discretionary spending to its lowest level since the '60s." But his own forecast put the figure higher than under Reagan, Clinton, Bush 41 or Bush 43. On Oil: On February 24th he told a joint session of Congress that "we import more oil today than ever before." This isn't true. Imports peaked in 2005 but are much lower now. On Mortgages: In the same speech to Congress he claimed his mortgage plan would help responsible buyers but not those who borrowed beyond their means. However his own administration confirms that those who borrowed beyond their means would receive help as well. On Education: In a March 10th address on education Obama claimed that the high school dropout rate has "tripled in the past 30 years." This isn't true either, it has actually declined by a third. On Jobs: Obama has repeatedly stated that his stimulus package will create or save 3.5 million jobs, while that may be possible, it is far from a certainty. As a matter of fact the economy has been losing 22,000 jobs a day since Obama became President. On Mexico's Guns: On April 16th during a visit to Mexico, President Obama said "More than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States." However, Mexico does not request that the United States trace all the guns they recover, so there is no way to know how ma

Does President Obama have any clue what the rest of his administration is doing ? The unannounced recent flyover of New York City by two fighter jets and a 747 from the presidential fleet to buzz ground zero and the Statue Liberty for a photo op set off nightmarish fears of a 9/11 replay. The flyover was ordered by the White House Office of Military Affairs so it would have souvenir photos of Air Force One with the Statue of Liberty in the background. To make matters worse, the Federal Aviation Administration's James Johnston said the agency was aware of "the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes" in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor's office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out. Even New York Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer disapproved stating: "To say that it should not be made public knowing that it might scare people it's just confounding, It's what gives Washington and government a bad name. It's sheer stupidity." The NYPD was so upset about the demand for secrecy that Police Commissioner Ray Kelly vowed never to follow such a directive again and he accused the feds of inciting fears of a 9/11 replay. "Did it show an insensitivity to the psychic wounds New York City has after 9/11? Absolutely. No questions about it. It was quite insensitive," Kelly said. President Obama ordered an internal review of Monday's low-flying photo op over the Statue of Liberty. "It was a mistake. It will never happen again," President Obama said. But if this was carried out by the White House Office of Military Affairs, didn't anyone brief the President on this? And if they didn't why not? Is Obama in control or are others running the show? Read more here: WCBS TV We have since learned that the White House planned a similar flyover in Washington DC on May 5th or 6th according to the Wall Street Journal. "

Yesterday was a great day at the Boston Tea Party that took place on the Boston Common across from the State House. I arrived in Boston with my assistant Dave at about 10:30 AM. There were about 75-100 people present at that time. Within an hour there were hundreds. From 12 noon to 3:00 PM there were about 1500-2000 in attendance. The event was pretty well organzied with the exception of the sound system which consisted of megaphones, which led to very low audio if you were way in the back of the crowd. The crowd was very well behaved and loud and vocal at the same time, with chants of "Dump Barney" echoing through the crowd as well as other chants about Turnpike tolls, Obama, etc.. A lot of credit should be given to Corie Whalen (pictured below in pink scarf), a college student, who with others help, organized this event. Jay Are with Tea party Participant Who Wants to Send Obama A Message Poor Elmo..My Grandaughter Would Have Been Devaststed If She Saw Him Here Like This Then it was on to the Worcester Tea Party where I was very surprised to find between 1000 and 1500 in attendance and a very well organized presentation with a good sound system. Again a very well behaved but loud and vocal crowd interacting with the speakers at the event. All through the event from 4-6PM you could hear car horns honking approval of the Tea Party participants. A Sea Of Attendees At The Worcester Tea party Jay Are Looks Down At The Crowd Of Tea Party Attendees At Worcester Auditorium Jay In Front Of One Of The Props At The Worcester Tea Party More Photos of The Boston and Worcester Tea Parties@Kodakgallery.com: Slideshow

NewsMax is reporting that: Although the number of viewers watching the presidential inauguration coverage of Barack Obama was impressive, they fall short of those who saw Ronald Reagan take the oath of office for his first term in 1981. According to Nielsen Media Research, 37.8 million television viewers tuned in Tuesday to watch the swearing-in ceremony, which was the largest inaugural audience in 28 years. Reagan's first inauguration in 1981 drew a whopping 41.8 million. Obama's figures include telecasts on 17 broadcast and cable networks, while Reagan's swearing-in ceremony nearly three decades ago could only be seen on ABC, CBS and NBC.

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/ http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6771521759788800576&hl=en

In an interview Obama's choice for secretary of commerce, Gov. Bill Richardson, slipped up. In an effort to reach out to the Hispanic community, he admitted what Barack Obama has been trying to hide: "Barack Obama is an immigrant." Richardson admitted that Barack Obama is NOT a natural born citizen. That means if Obama takes over the White House in January he will be in direct violation of the Constitution. So says one of his own Cabinet members. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83114#

On November 4th, twelve Obama voters were interviewed by John Ziegler after they voted to learn how the news media affected their knowledge during the campaign. Watch John Ziegler's appearance on Fox News, Hannity & Comes show. Because obviously interviewing a relative handful of Obama voters, while interesting, is hardly scientific proof of anything, we also commissioned a Zogby telephone poll which asked the very same questions (as well as a few others) with similarly amazing results. Zogby Po

Breitbart.tv recently published this video: "It's a senseless war! And by the way, Kathy, the person that you're picking for president said that our troops could stay in Iraq for another hundred years if they need to! So that means that your daddy could stay in the military for another hundred years!" Here it is folks, PROOF of what I have been saying for years, how our children are being indoctrinated by liberal teachers in the public school system. Can you imagine this poor girl who wiilingly partcip