So, why are other parties not included in national debates? Do we or do we not have choices? It seems to me that withholding views and candidates and alternative political parties from main recognition is a condensed form of democracy. Rather like having an alphabet of only 13 letters and we are to write an essay -or- putting a bit of flour in a glass of water and calling it milk! Without information we cannot make choices, thus leading the public through a "Baskin-Robbins" Ice Cream Parlor and the ONLY choices are Grapefruit or Walnut....neither example provides me an option to experience flavors that I can accept as viable for ice cream. I suppose to make myself clearer, if we have a choice, I want different points of view and all of the tools and reasons why I could/should commit to any given party. I think that without proper information and/or input from all - it is not in a citizens or the countries best interest and what we so often find by condensing politics...it does end up with only mud and slime being hurled and further more descends itself to the playground bullying and raunchy behavior of immature ego enhancements.A song that comes to mind is, Head em' up-move em out-move em out head em up take em in, let em out RAWHIDE, take em in-let em out-let em out take em in-let em out-take them in, RAWHIDE!

Dandelion Saladheathr456Rachel reports on all of the conservatives who are throwing McCain and Palin under the bus, and a very rude David Frum joins her to talk about it. more about "Rachel Maddow: GOP Panic with David Frum", posted with vodpod***Dana Bash Interviews John McCainseeCountdown: Troopergate + Richard Lewis Sarah Palin on SNL? Just say NO!Max Blumenthal on Sarah Palin’s Radical Right-Wing Pals + Feeding the Hate TrooperGate Official Report Finds Gov Palin Broke Alaska Law Rachel Maddow: Palin’s Secessionist Connection + Palin’s radical right-wing mentors McCain Campaign Masters the Art of Dog Whistling Their Fear Mongering to the Religious Right McCain-JohnPalin-SarahObama-BarackBiden-Joe