This is textbook leftist polemics. To win the debate, you must control the arguement. To control the arguement, you must control the language. As when Dyson defines anything Breitbart says as racist. This tactic has been going on in academics for decades.

What exactly did Dyson "articulate" here? A lot of theories that don't hold water. For all the black Americans out there - it's ok to be conservative and black. Don't let Mayer and Dyson tell you otherwise. Next time Mayer, let the conservative guest express his opinion before you or your liberal guest jump down his throat with your rhetoric.

Dyson does indeed show how to do it: change the subject, lie as fast as you can, and spout a lot of b.s. about "code language". He can't address what Breitbart actually says, so he reframes it to mean something else. He's a fraud.

Inventor Granville Woods Biography ----- 1856 Granville T. Woods was born a free black man on April 23, ... Woods developed the concept of a third rail which would allow a train to ...

This is why I don't watch Bill Maher. It's always 2 on 1. The liberal and conservative spar and Maher looks for the opportunity for the dagger in the conservative's back. There's no thoughtful debate here. Maher asks a question about direction of the Republican party and no one minute elapses before he whips out the race card, which is "code word" for the liberal atomic bomb of intimidation.

Much respect to Michael Eric Dyson. He faces a lot of overt opposition on a regular basis but he holds it down every time...

Andrew Breitbart is as ignorant as they come.

Michael Eric Dyson shows you how to do this, son.