I’m exhausted today. Somewhere between the clamorous drunken belligerence of a few over-compensating males in the apartment across the street and the dick of a bird in the tree outside my open window (who also seemed to be shouting at a near intoxicated-human level), I was robbed of sleep and rest for most of the night. Needless to say this 8 hour workday (on the day of the NFL draft, no less) is dragging slower than a half-frozen knuckle-walker covered in molasses. It may be due to this exhaustion that I’m intrigued by the articles that I’ve been able to read today, especially those concerned with the use of Adderall as a neuro-enhancer and productivity inducer. Turns out, however, that reading about others using adderall to increase productivity does not actually increase productivity for the reader. I was much dismayed by this fact.Look or sound like someone you know?So I might as well be candid about this whole thing because I’ve tried this method before. It was only a couple times but it worked. I would have gotten much better grades had I done it regularly, but I had enough to deal with without frying my brain. (Which would have happened. One of the things I learned in college is that my brain is highly susceptible, more so than any of my peers for some reason, to all sorts of outside chemicals.) I attended a liberal arts college that took pride in the workload that it piled on its students. In fact, the school was rated in the top 10 nationally for workload each year I was there. The professors were nice enough, I suppose, but they took the rule of thumb- 3 hours of homework for 1 hour of class- and then went beyond it if they could. There was an amazing amount of posturing and academic muscle flexing at the expense of student mental health. At least, that’s what I perceived. Needless to say this was an intense place where academic performance was the top priority and free time was scarce. To keep up, many students turned to stimulants of the ritalin/adde
I’m sorry but he just does. Rep. Joe Barton, Texas republican, posted this video on his youtube page titled “Energy Secretary puzzled by simple question”. Here’s what the video description says, “When Rep. Joe Barton asked the Nobel Prize winning Energy Secretary, Dr. Steven Chu, where oil comes from - he got a puzzling answer. “. What?! Watch the video, Yeah, so Rep. Joe Barton is “bragging” about how he “puzzled” Dr. Chu, a scientist, about where oil comes from. I think Rep. Barton shouldn’t be asking that question at his age and especially when he’s working on the “Energy and Commerce Committee”. This is proof why all universities need to require their students to take a basic science class, I don’t know requiring geology specifically might be a little too much for some people. The reason Barton has a perception issue is simple…he perceived the situation to have worked in his benefit to the point where he thought he’d brag about it on youtube. It’s clear in the video that Barton looked stupid and there’s no way he should waste the last 6 seconds asking a science question he should have learned in college at least. Also, it seems clear the Rep. Barton was oddly puzzled that oil doesn’t appear out of no where or that all oil doesn’t naturally come from Texas. This question was stupid, usually people say there’s no such thing as a stupid question. That’s something you say to kids to get them to learn more, for Rep. Barton this was a stupid question. That’s my perception of this video, whether you disagree with this or not. I perceive this to be a better perception of this situation then how Rep. Barton perceived it.WordPress.com Political Blogger AllianceAdd to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | NewsvinePosted in Author Sensico, energy, environment, Politics, Quick Thought Tagged: congressman joe bartion, dr. steven chu, energy, energy and commerce committee, environment, issues, Po
Oh the (rare, but occasionally exceptional) joys of Twitter. Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX)--the ranking member on the House Energy & Commerce Committee--says (tweets?) "I seemed to have baffled the Energy Sec with basic question - Where does oil come from?"He's referring to Nobel prize winning Energy Secretary Steve Chu, and this exchange. I'm gonna go way out on a limb here and suggest that--just perhaps!--Barton has misread Chu's initial response to the question. And also that he doesn't seem to understand geology as well as the former Stanford physicist who now runs the Department of Energy. But I could be wrong. Late update: My colleague Eric Kleefeld chimes in to suggest that Barton did stump Chu. In fact, Chu was stumped that this guy Barton (a Congressman) had actually asked that question.
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/environment/Idiot_Congressman_Thinks_He_Stumped_Nobel_Winning_Scientist';
Oh the (rare, but occasionally exceptional) joys of Twitter. Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX)--the ranking member on the House Energy & Commerce Committee--says (tweets?) "I seemed [sic] to have baffled the Energy Sec with basic question - Where does oil come from?"
He's referring to Nobel prize winning Energy Secretary Steve Chu, and this exchange.
I'm gonna go way out on a limb here and suggest that--just perhaps!--Barton has misread Chu's initial response to the question. And also that he doesn't seem to understand geology as well as the former Stanford physicist who now runs the Department of Energy. But I could be wrong.
Late update: My colleague Eric Kleefeld chimes in to suggest that Barton did stump Chu. In fact, Chu was stumped that this guy Barton (a Congressman) had actually asked that question.