What is most persuasive about this documentary is the complete lack of filmmaker (Dylan Avery) voice-over or use of other techniques to drive the narrative discourse – Avery's use of voice-over narration is devoid of opinion, speculation, conjecture, or propaganda, thus making the film a surprisingly persuasive critical approach to the propaganda model of mainstream media and gov't agencies.

Arguably most notable is Avery's use of primary sources (i.e. gov't memos, documents, declassified FBI files, etc.) to drive the narrative passively, forcing the viewer to independently assess the cumulative intelligence. Encourages intellectual discourse and disparages the we-the-sheeple mentality that blindly accepts whatever official version of events they're fed in the name of manufacturing consent.

What is most persuasive about this documentary is the complete lack of filmmaker (Dylan Avery) voice-over or use of other techniques to drive the narrative discourse – Avery's use of voice-over narration is devoid of opinion, speculation, conjecture, or propaganda, thus making the film a surprisingly persuasive critical approach to the propaganda model of mainstream media and gov't agencies.

Arguably most notable is Avery's use of primary sources (i.e. gov't memos, documents, declassified FBI files, etc.) to drive the narrative passively, forcing the viewer to independently assess the cumulative intelligence. Encourages intellectual discourse and disparages the we-the-sheeple mentality that blindly accepts whatever official version of events they're fed in the name of manufacturing consent.

Something to think about..

Think for yourself.